USCA1 Opinion

                                [Not for Publication]

                            United States Court of Appeals

                                For the First Circuit

                                 ____________________

        No. 96-2095



                 HORIZONS HOTEL d/b/a CARIB INN TENNIS CLUB & CASINO

                        AND/OR HOTEL ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED,



                                     Petitioner,



                                          v.



                         THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,



                                     Respondent.



                                 ____________________



                                ON PETITION FOR REVIEW

                        AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT

            OF A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges,
                                            ______________

                            and O'Toole,* District Judge.
                                          ______________



                                 ____________________



            Wallace Vazquez Sanabria on brief for Petitioner.
            ________________________

            Corinna L. Metcalf,  Deputy Assistant  General Counsel,  Frederick
            __________________                                       _________

        L. Feinstein, General Counsel,  Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel,
        ____________                    __________

        and  Aileen A. Armstrong,  Deputy Associate General  Counsel, on brief
             ___________________

        for Respondent.

                                 ____________________



                                     MAY 19, 1997

                                 ____________________















        _____________________

        *Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation





































                      Per curiam.  Having carefully reviewed the parties'
                      Per curiam.
                      __________



            briefs and  submissions, we find that  the administrative law



            judge's  findings, adopted  by  the National  Labor Relations



            Board, are  supported by  substantial evidence in  the record



            and  reflect a correct application of the law.  Therefore, we



            deny Petitioner's request for  review, and grant Respondent's



            request  for enforcement of its  supplemental order.  See 1st
                                                                  ___



            Cir. R. 27.1.  Costs to Respondent.
                           _____ __ __________











































































                                         -2-
                                          2