USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 97-1096



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                             CARLOS RENE GONZALEZ-CORREA,



                                Defendant, Appellant.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO



                   [Hon. Daniel R. Dominguez, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                               Selya, Boudin and Stahl,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Lucien  B. Campbell,  Acting Federal  Public Defender,  and  Laura
            ___________________                                          _____

        Maldonado Rodriguez,  Assistant Federal Public Defender,  on brief for
        ___________________

        appellant.

            Guillermo Gil, United  States Attorney, Nelson Perez-Sosa, Antonio
            _____________                           _________________  _______

        R. Bazan,  Assistant  United States  Attorneys,  and Jose  A.  Quiles-
        ________                                             _________________

        Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.
        ________





                                 ____________________



                                    June 20, 1997

                                 ____________________

































                 Per Curiam.  Upon careful review  of the parties' briefs
                 __________



            and  the record, we find  no reason to  overturn the district



            court's conclusion.  We cannot  say that the district court's



            findings were clearly erroneous.



                 The sentence is affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                                 ________   ___























































































                                         -2-