USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


                           UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                ____________________



       No. 97-1205


                                 ANA MARIA CAMACHO,


                                Plaintiff, Appellant,


                                         v.


                        FONDO DEL SEGURO DEL ESTADO, ET AL.,


                               Defendants, Appellees.


                                ____________________



                    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO


                  [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]


                                ____________________


                                       Before


                              Selya, Boudin and Stahl,

                                   Circuit Judges.


                                ____________________


            Miguel E. Miranda on brief for appellant.

            Zaida Prieto-Rivera  on brief for  appellee Fondo Del  Seguro Del

       Estado.



                                ____________________


                                    July 7, 1997

                                ____________________








                 Per 
                    Curiam. 
                            
                            As 
                               appellant did not file a motion under Fed.


            R. Civ. P. 50 before the  district court, and as she has  not


            provided us with transcripts of the jury trial, we are unable


            to review her contention that the evidence was such that  the


            jury's 
                  verdict should be set aside.  See Hammond v. T.J. Litle


            & Co., 82 F.3d 1166,  1171 (1st Cir. 1996); Muniz Ramirez  v.


            Puerto 
                  Rico 
                      Fire 
                           Services, 757 F.2d 1357, 1358 (1st Cir. 1985).


            Moreover, our review of the documents included in appellant's


            appendix suggests that the jury may have resolved conflicting


            evidence about defendants' conduct  or other elements of  the


            claim;  in  no  event   would  we  second-guess  the   jury's


            determination
                         of the weight and credibility due that evidence.


                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.




























                                         -2-