USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 97-1313





                        EMANUEL R. GRANGE, A/K/A TEDDY MURPHY,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                              DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,



                                 Defendant, Appellee.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________



                                 ____________________



            Emanuel R. Grange, a/k/a Teddy Murphy on brief pro se.
            _____________________________________

            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney   General,  and   Ellyn  H.   Lazar,
            __________________                              _________________

        Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.





                                 ____________________



                                  September 22, 1997

                                 ____________________





































                      Per Curiam.   Appellant  Emanuel R.  Grange appeals
                      __________



            from  the district court's  dismissal of his  complaint filed



            under  42 U.S.C.     1983.    After carefully  reviewing  the



            parties' briefs and the record, we believe that the dismissal



            was  correct  for  essentially  the  reasons  stated  in  the



            district court's Order, dated January 23, 1997.



                      Affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.    
                      ________   ___















































































                                         -2-