Graham v. Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Graham v. Corrections

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 96-2376

STEVEN A. GRAHAM,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

MAINE COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Steven A. Graham on brief pro se. ________________
Robert F. Hanson, Christopher C. Taintor and Norman, Hanson & _________________ _______________________ _________________
DeTroy on brief for appellees Bert Beverly, M.D. and Rock Welch. ______
Andrew Ketterer, Attorney General, Linda Conti and Francis ________________ ____________ _______
Ackerman, Assistant Attorney Generals, on brief for appellees Lehman, ________
Merrill, Lorenz and Farrington.

____________________

September 5, 1997
____________________
















Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and ___________

the record on appeal. We affirm the amended judgment of the

district court, dated October 29, 1996, essentially for the

reasons stated in the magistrate-judge's recommended

decision, dated September 30, 1996.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. _________









































-2-






Reference

Status
Published