USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT







                                 ____________________





        No. 97-1566



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                                KEVIN PATRICK GILDEA,



                                Defendant, Appellant.





                                 ____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                    [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                                   Selya and Stahl,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Mark J. Gillis on brief for appellant.
            ______________

            Donald  K. Stern,  United  States  Attorney, and  James  F.  Lang,
            ________________                                  _______________

        Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.





                                 ____________________



                                   December 4, 1997

                                 ____________________































                 Per Curiam.    Upon careful  review  of the  briefs  and
                 __________



            record, we perceive no reason  to set aside the revocation of



            probation or the sentence imposed.  The magistrate judge  and



            district court adequately  explained the rulings, and  we add



            only these comments:



                 1.   The findings, including the  finding that appellant



            waived  a  preliminary  hearing  and  also  waived  appointed



            counsel, are adequately supported by the record.  



                 2.   Essentially for the  reasons given by the  district



            court,  the FBI's request  that the probation  officer submit



            the  petition for  revocation at  a particular  time did  not



            invalidate the revocation.



                 3.   None of  the issues  raised in  appellant's pro  se



            supplemental brief  present grounds  for reversal  here.   We



            decline  to   consider  his  challenges  to   his  underlying



            conviction and sentence.



                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                 ________   ___







































                                         -2-