Paleologos v. Nickless
Paleologos v. Nickless
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1903
ATHENA PALEOLOGOS,
Appellant,
v.
DAVID M. NICKLESS, ET AL.,
Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Athena Paleologos on brief pro se.
David M. Nickless and Nickless and Phillips on brief for
appellee.
January 23, 1998
Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record and
briefs on appeal and affirm the judgment of the Bankruptcy
Court. Although the avoidance provisions of 11 U.S.C. 549
may sometimes operate in a manner which appears harsh,
bankruptcy courts must exercise their equitable powers within
the confines of the Bankruptcy Code. Norwest Bank
Worthington v. Ahlers,
485 U.S. 197, 206(1988). The court
has no power to upset the scheme of distribution established
by the Code. In re SPM Manufacturing Corporation,
984 F.2d 1305, 1311(1st Cir. 1993).
With respect to Appellant's remaining arguments, she
made no proper showing that Trustee's action was time-barred
or otherwise inconsistent with the requirements of the Code.1 1
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.
1 Appellant's request for oral argument by telephone is 1 hereby denied.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished