Schofield v. Brown
Schofield v. Brown
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1914
GENE SCHOFIELD,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
JAMES BROWN, ETC., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
Gene Schofield on brief pro se.
Ann Pauly, Richmond, Pauly & Ault and Leon Friedman on brief for
appellees James Brown and Polygram Records, Inc. Leonard L. Lewin, Michael N. Sheetz, and Gadsby & Hannah on
brief for appellees Dynatone Publishing Co. and Rightsong Music, Inc.
February 5, 1998
Per Curiam. This is an appeal from a summary judgment
dismissing appellant's claims of copyright infringement.
Reviewing the judgment de novo, in light of the briefs and
the record, we agree with the district court's analysis and
affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in that
court's Memorandum and Order of June 11, 1997. See Loc. R.
27.1. We also see no abuse of discretion in the court's
alternative ruling on the defense of laches, nor in the
multiple procedural rulings which appellant assigns as errors
on appeal.
Affirmed.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished