Bresnahan v. IRS
Bresnahan v. IRS
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1708
JOHN BRESNAHAN,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge,
Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
John Bresnahan on brief pro se.
Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa E.
McLaughlin and Thomas J. Sawyer, Attorneys, Tax Division, Department
of Justice, on brief for appellee.
FEBRUARY 20, 1998
Per Curiam. We have carefully considered the record in
this case, including the briefs of the parties and the
decision of the court below. We affirm essentially for the
reasons given by the tax court in its memorandum opinion,
dated November 5, 1996.
The two letters attached to petitioner's appellate
brief, but not introduced into evidence before the tax court,
are insufficient to sustain this appeal since we place no
reliance on evidence not introduced below. See John Hancock
Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. United States,
155 F.2d 977, 978 n.1
(1st Cir. 1946) (refusing to consider evidence on appeal
which had not first been introduced in the court below).
Affirmed.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished