Downtown Development v. K-Mart Corporation
Downtown Development v. K-Mart Corporation
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 97-2316
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT, CORP.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
K-MART CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Johanna Emmanuelli Huertas, with whom Pedro E. Ortiz Alvarez
and The Law Offices of Pedro E. Ortiz Alvarez were on brief for
appellant. Jon R. Steiger, with whom Patrick M. McCarthy, Howard &
Howard, Steven C. Lausell, James W. McCartney and Jim nez,
Graffam & Lausell were on brief for appellee.
February 26, 1998
Per Curiam. On March 27, 1996, Downtown Development Per Curiam.
Corporation ("Downtown") filed this action to recover damages
arising from K-Mart Corporation's ("K-Mart's") alleged illegal
occupancy of Downtown's property in Ponce, Puerto Rico. Downtown
appeals the district court's decision to grant summary judgment
in favor of K-Mart Corporation ("K-Mart").
We affirm on the grounds stated in the district court's
opinion and order. See Downtown Dev. Corp. v. K-Mart Corp., Civ.
96-1497CCC (D.P.R. September 25, 1997). We find clause 27 of the
lease at issue dispositive. As the district court noted, that
provision grants K-Mart the option to remain as a month-to-month
tenant after the expiration of the lease until it is forced out
by the courts. In the instant case, K-Mart simply exercised this
option.
Costs to be assessed against appellant.
Affirmed. Affirmed
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished