United States v. Nunez-Rodriguez
United States v. Nunez-Rodriguez
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1669
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
JOSE ANTONIO NUNEZ-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Jose Antonio Fuste, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Boudin, Circuit Judge, Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
H. Manuel Hernandez on brief for appellant. Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez, Executive Assistant United States Attorney, Jose A. Quiles-Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Nelson Perez-Sosa, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
April 7, 1998
Per Curiam. The district court considered the new motion for a departure on the merits and made clear that it had no interest in granting a departure. This discretionary refusal to depart is not subject to appellate review. See United States v. Nunez-Rodriguez,
92 F.3d 14(1st Cir. 1996), and it is therefore unnecessary for us to consider whether a decision to depart would have been within the scope of remand and allowed under the law of the case doctrine. Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished