United States v. Mamoorian

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

United States v. Mamoorian

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 98-1030

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

KENNETH MAMOORIAN,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Robert B. Mann and Mann & Mitchell on brief for appellant. Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, Margaret E. Curran and Edwin J. Gale, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for appellee.

April 9, 1998

Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the briefs and record, we conclude that the upward departure should be upheld based on under-representation of defendant's criminal conduct. SeeU.S.S.G. 4A1.3. In these circumstances, we need not determine the validity of any additional departure grounds, as we are convinced that excision of the challenged grounds would not have altered the sentence imposed. See United States v. Brewster,

127 F.3d 22, 30

(1st Cir. 1997). We also conclude that the district court did not clearly err in denying an adjustment under U.S.S.G. 3B1.2 for defendant's role in the offense. The finding that defendant's role was neither minimal nor minor was well supported by the information about defendant's multiple cross-country deliveries of large quantities of marijuana. Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.

Reference

Status
Unpublished