USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 97-1815





                                  HENRY K. BOATENG,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                             KATHLEEN E. O'TOOLE, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                    [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                 Selya, Circuit Judge,
                                        _____________

                              Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                   ____________________

                              and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
                                          _____________



                                 ____________________



            Henry K. Boateng on brief pro se.
            ________________

            Bruce R. Henry, Susan M.  O'Hara and Morrison, Mahoney & Miller on
            ______________  ________________     __________________________

        brief for appellees.





                                 ____________________



                                   January 28, 1998

                                 ____________________



































                 Per  Curiam.  We  have reviewed the  parties' briefs and
                 ___________



            the  record  on appeal.    We  affirm  the grant  of  summary



            judgment  in favor  of the  defendants,  essentially for  the



            reasons  stated in the district court's memorandum and order,



            dated May 30, 1997.



                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.
                 _________



















































































                                         -2-