United States v. Medeiros

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

United States v. Medeiros

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 97-1611


UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

ROBERT MEDEIROS,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Thomas A. Grasso on brief for appellant. ________________
Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, Margaret E. Curran ___________________ ___________________
and Charles A. Tamuleviz, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief ____________________
for appellee.


____________________

February 10, 1998
____________________
















Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the record, briefs, ___________

and the government's motion for summary disposition, it

plainly appears that the district court's discretionary

decision to deny a downward departure is not subject to

appellate review. See United States v. Saldana, 109 F.3d ___ ______________ _______

100, 103 (1st Cir. 1997).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1. ________ ___







































-2-






Reference

Status
Published