USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 97-2269





                                    FRIEDRICH LU,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                                 HARSHBARGER, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                          Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________



                                 ____________________



            Friedrich Lu on brief pro se.
            ____________

            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney General,  and  Juliana deHaan  Rice,
            __________________                           ____________________

        Assistant  Attorney   General,  on   appellees'  motion  for   summary

        disposition and memorandum of law.





                                 ____________________



                                   February 2, 1998

                                 ____________________





































                 Per Curiam.  Upon review of the record and consideration
                 __________



            of  the  arguments  raised  in  appellant's  briefs  and  the



            appellees' motion  for  summary disposition,  we perceive  no



            substantial reason to overturn the order of dismissal.



                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                 ________   ___























































































                                         -2-