United States v. Calixce
United States v. Calixce
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-1708
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
JEAN-BAPTISTE CALIXCE,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge] [Hon. James R. Muirhead, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
Before
Lynch, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
Scott A. Lutes on brief for appellant. Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Jennifer E. Cole, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Government's Motion for Summary Disposition.
April 2, 1999
Per Curiam. Jean Baptiste-Calixce challenges his conviction on the ground that the district court erred in denying his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. The government has moved for summary affirmance. We grant the government's motion substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its Order dated February 10, 1998.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished