[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 98-2203

JAMSHED ANVARI,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, WILLIAM A. CONTE, EDITH NOURSE ROGERS VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL, FRANCES JULIE FUSCO, JOEL ARNOLD, MICHAEL CAREY, JOAN MILNER AND UNITED STATES,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Stahl, Circuit Judge.

Jamshed Anvari on brief pro se. Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Michael J. Pineault, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellees.

July 15, 1999

Per Curiam. Pro se plaintiff Jamshed Anvari appeals a district court order that summarily dismissed his complaint based on the defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (5), and (6). Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the order of dismissal is correct. Plaintiff's claims are wholly preempted by the remedies available to him under civil service law. See, e.g., Berry v. Hollander,

(9th Cir. 1991); Heaney v. United States Veterans Administration,

(5th Cir. 1985); Premachandra v. United States,

(8th Cir. 1984); Roth v. United States,

(1st Cir. 1991); Berrios v. Dep't of the Army,

(1st Cir. 1989); Maniktahla v. John J. Pershing VA Medical Center,

(E.D. Mo. 1997); Hicks v. Brown

(E.D. Ark. 1996); Gregor v. Derwinski,

(W.D.N.Y. 1996). Consequently, we need not address the parties' remaining arguments. Affirmed. See Local Rule 27.1.