USCA1 Opinion

       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

                 United States Court of Appeals

                     For the First Circuit











No. 98-1262



          THE GREAT WEST-LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.,



                      Plaintiffs, Appellees,



                                v.



                          OMAR S. ZAKI,



                      Defendant, Appellant.







           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



            [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]







                              Before



                     Boudin, Circuit Judge,

                 Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,

                   and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

     Omar S. Zaki on brief pro se.

     Robert L. Hamer, Robert B. Gibbons, Mirick, O'Connell,

DeMallie & Lougee, LLP, Joseph F. Ryan, Lyne, Woodworth & Evarts

LLP, Philip M. Howe and Lecomte, Emanuelson, Montejunas & Doyle on

brief for appellees.











October 6, 1999







  

            Per Curiam.    By order of November 4, 1998, we

  postponed the processing of this appeal from a post-judgment

  charging order to avoid the possibility of piecemeal review. 

  Appellees have informed us that all of the district court

  motions by and against the reach and apply defendant, Anne L.

  Zaki, have been withdrawn.  The district court proceedings now

  have concluded, and no appeal has been taken by Anne L. Zaki. 

            Reviewing the arguments relating to appellant Omar S.

  Zaki's interests in the light of the slim record thus properly

  before us, the order is affirmed.  Below, appellant did not

  squarely present in a timely fashion the arguments about his

  own interests which he seeks to raise here, but merely denied

  having an interest in the partnership.  His arguments about the

  rights and prerogatives of the IRS and Anne L. Zaki also are

  not properly before us. 

            Accordingly, insofar as the charging order determines

  appellees' rights against appellant Omar S. Zaki and any

  interest which appellant Zaki may have in the limited

  partnership, the judgment is affirmed.