[NOT FOR PUBLICATIONNOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 99-1067

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

LUIS A. RIVERA,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.

Allan M. Tow on brief for appellant. Margaret E. Curran, United States Attorney, Donald C. Lockhart and Gerard B. Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for appellees.

February 2, 2000

Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record and of the parties' submissions, we affirm. We find no error in the lower court's conclusion that police did not exceed the scope of the search warrant by looking through a bag found in appellant's car or in the glove compartment. "A warrant to search a vehicle . . . support[s] a search of every part of the vehicle that might contain the object of the search." United States v. Ross,

(1982). Once an officer conducting a search in a lawful manner discovers evidence in plain view providing probable cause of a crime, that evidence may be seized. United States v. Robles,

(1st Cir. 1995). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider appellant's challenge to his sentence. United States v. Rosario-Peralta, F.3d ,

(1st Cir. 1999). Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).