U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 2000

Ross v. Framingham

Ross v. Framingham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided June 23, 2000

Ross v. Framingham

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 99-1649 GERSHON ROSS; MARLENE W. ROSS; AS GUARDIAN FOR GERSHON ROSS, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. THE FRAMINGHAM SCHOOL COMMITTEE; TOWN OF FRAMINGHAM; MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]

Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Marlene W. Ross on brief pro se.

Aaron K. Bikofsky, Philip B. Benjamin and Bikofsky & White on brief for appellees.

June 23,2000 Per Curiam. We have carefully read the parties' submissions and have reviewed the district court and administrative records. Based on our review, we find that the decision to grant the defendants' motions for summary judgment was without error. We therefore affirm the judgement of the district court for essentially the reasons stated in its opinion, Ross v. Framingham School Comm., 44 F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Mass. 1999).

Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.