Coltin v. Town of Londonderry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Coltin v. Town of Londonderry

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 99-1849

DAVID H. COLTIN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

TOWN OF LONDONDERRY; CHRISTOPHER CHILDS; WILLIAM R. HART JR.; ETHEL COLTIN; FRANCIS RAPISARDI,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.

David H. Coltin on brief pro se. Donald E. Gardner and Devine, Millimet & Branch on brief for appellees.

SEPTEMBER 8, 2000 Per Curiam. Plaintiff Coltin appeals from a summary

judgment dismissing all claims in his complaint on the

merits. The complaint asserted claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

, as well as state law claims of false arrest and

malicious prosecution. Upon de novo review of the judgment

in light of the parties' briefs and appendix materials, we

affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the

district court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion of May

5, 1999, and in the order denying reconsideration of June 9,

1999.

Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).

Reference

Status
Published