Coltin v. Town of Londonderry
Coltin v. Town of Londonderry
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 99-1849 DAVID H. COLTIN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TOWN OF LONDONDERRY; CHRISTOPHER CHILDS; WILLIAM R. HART JR.; ETHEL COLTIN; FRANCIS RAPISARDI, Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
David H. Coltin on brief pro se.
Donald E. Gardner and Devine, Millimet & Branch on brief for appellees.
SEPTEMBER 8, 2000 Per Curiam. Plaintiff Coltin appeals from a summary judgment dismissing all claims in his complaint on the merits. The complaint asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as state law claims of false arrest and malicious prosecution. Upon de novo review of the judgment in light of the parties' briefs and appendix materials, we affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion of May 5, 1999, and in the order denying reconsideration of June 9, 1999.
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.