Ibrahim v. United States
Ibrahim v. United States
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 00-1507
JABRIL L. IBRAHIM, a/k/a Grant Anderson,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Jugde, Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
Jabril L. Ibrahim on brief pro se. Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, and F. Mark Terison, Senior Litigation Counsel, on Motion for Summary Affirmance for appellee.
December 20, 2000 Per Curiam. Having thoroughly reviewed the record
and the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the
appellant's complaint was properly dismissed as frivolous
under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Moreover, the appellant
has waived the arguments he now raises on appeal because he
failed to object to the magistrate judge's report. See,
e.g., Davet v. Maccarone,
973 F.2d 22, 31(1st Cir. 1992).
Accordingly, the appellee's motion for summary
affirmance is allowed and the judgment of the district court
is affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Published