Greenman v. Reilly
Greenman v. Reilly
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 01-1221
WENDELL GREENMAN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Defendant, Appellee. ____________________
No. 01-1295
GEORGE E. DONOVAN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Boudin, Chief Judge, Torruella and Lynch, Circuit Judges. Wendell Greenman on brief pro se. George F. Donovan on brief pro se. Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, and James J. Arguin, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.
September 27, 2001 Per Curiam. In these consolidated appeals,
appellants, who are state inmates serving life sentences for
second-degree murder, appeal from the dismissal of their
suit for declaratory relief. Appellants asked the district
court to find their statutes of conviction to be
unconstitutional. Although this is a habeas claim,
appellants have not stated that they have exhausted their
state remedies. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of
their suit, essentially for the reasons given by the
district judge in her Memorandum of Decision dated January
8, 2001 and by the appellee in his appellate brief.
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).
-3-
Reference
- Status
- Published