Rasten v. Town of Brookline
Rasten v. Town of Brookline
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
Nos. 00-2480 01-1218 ANINA RASTEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TOWN OF BROOKLINE, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Morris E. Lasker, Senior U.S. District Judge]
Before Boudin, Chief Judge, Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges.
Anina Rasten on brief pro se.
George F. Driscoll, Jr., Office of Town Counsel, on brief for appellees.
DECEMBER 4, 2001 Per Curiam. After due consideration of record and briefs on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.