Rasten v. Gelbond
Rasten v. Gelbond
Rasten v. Gelbond
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 01-1375 ANINA RASTEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BLAIR GELBOND, Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge]
Before Torruella, Circuit Judge, Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
Anina Rasten on brief pro se.
DECEMBER 4,2001 Per Curiam. After due consideration of the record and the appellant’s brief, we perceive no error in the district court’s decision.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.