Stevenson v. State of NH
Stevenson v. State of NH
Opinion
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to lst Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 03-1971 JANICE W. STEVENSON, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MASSACHUSETTS SCHOOL OF LAW AT ANDOVER, INC., ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]
Before Torruella, Circuit Judge, Cyr and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.
Janice W. Stevenson on brief pro se.
Peter M. Malaguti on brief for appellees.
March 30, 2004 Per Curiam. The order of dismissal is affirmed substantially for the reasons recited in the district court's opinion dated May 7, 2003. Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a violation of her First Amendment rights plainly fails for lack of state action. See, e.g., Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830, 837-43 (1982); Logiodice v. Trustees of Maine Central Inst., 296 F.3d 22, 26-29 (1st Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1107 (2003); Krohn v. Harvard Law School, 552 F.2d 21, 23-24 (1st Cir. 1977). Her remaining claims have not been pursued on appeal and thus have been abandoned. See, e.g., Kearney v. Town of Wareham, 316 F.3d 18, 22 (1st Cir. 2002). We add that the district court's disposition of those claims appears unexceptionable in any event.
Affirmed.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.