After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. Among other considerations, the appellant failed to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 749; Parker v. Universidad de Puerto Rico, 225 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 2000). The court did not abuse its discretion in denying his second motion to amend his complaint. Mirpuri *760 v. ACT Mfg., Inc., 212 F.3d 624 (1st Cir. 2000).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).