Gomez-Flecha v. Commissioner
Gomez-Flecha v. Commissioner
110 F. App'x 146
Gomez-Flecha v. Commissioner
Opinion of the Court
After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
Despite his obesity, substantial evidence supported the determination that the appellant was not disabled. Irlanda Ortiz v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Serv., 955 F.2d 765 (1st Cir. 1991). The appellant does not establish that the ALJ failed to apply the proper standard in evaluating his pain. Avery v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Serv., 797 F.2d 19 (1st Cir. 1986). The appellant’s other arguments are equally unavailing.
Affirmed. 1st Circ. Rule 27(c).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.