Washington v. Cumberland County Jail

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Washington v. Cumberland County Jail, 161 F. App'x 29 (1st Cir. 2005)

Washington v. Cumberland County Jail

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment below.1

The record at summary judgment failed to reveal any trial-worthy issue. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c); Triangle Trading Co., Inc., v. Robroy Indus., Inc. 200 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1999). Among other problems, the appellant admitted that he never exhausted *30administrative remedies concerning his claim that he was denied access to legal materials. Nicolo v. Philip Morris, Inc., 201 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2000). In addition, he raises new issues on appeal that were not developed below, thus, are not properly before us. Hernandez-Hernandez v. United States, 904 F.2d 758 (1st Cir. 1990).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).

. Accordingly, we shall not appoint of counsel for the appellant.

Reference

Full Case Name
George WASHINGTON v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Status
Published