Rosa v. Maloney
Opinion
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 05-2796
THOMAS ROSA, JR.,
Petitioner, Appellant, v.
MICHAEL T. MALONEY,
Respondent, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Boudin, Chief Judge,
Torruella and Dyk,* Circuit Judges.
Kathleen M. McCarthy, was on brief, for appellant.
Susanne G. Reardon, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Bureau, with whom Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, were on brief, for appellee.
September 7, 2006
Per Curiam. Petitioner Thomas Rosa, Jr. ("Rosa") appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Rosa claims that his Massachusetts state court conviction for murder in the first degree and kidnaping, Commonwealth v. Rosa, 422 Mass. 18 (1996), should be set aside on two grounds. First, Rosa alleges that post-conviction DNA testing casts doubt on his original conviction. Second, the prosecution lost two pieces of evidence before DNA-testing could be performed. The district court found that neither ground was a viable challenge to Rosa's conviction. After carefully reviewing the parties' arguments, we affirm substantially for the reasons set out by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned memorandum and order. We find no arguments requiring further discussion on appeal.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.