U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 2009

DIRGA v. Butler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided February 5, 2009 · Benton, Browning, Kahn

1 So. 3d 1188; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 774; 2009 WL 258582 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. See § 48.193(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001); Dean v. Johns, 789 So.2d 1072, 1076-77 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., concur; KAHN, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

KAHN, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the trial court’s dismissal of this case because the constitutional minimum contacts requirement has not been demonstrated by appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.