U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 2014

Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp.

Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided June 9, 2014

Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp.

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 13-1085 IN RE: GENZYME CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION,

DEKA INTERNATIONAL S.A. LUXEMBOURG; CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL AS ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY OF THE LOTHIAN PENSION FUND; GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND, Plaintiffs, Appellants, VIVIAN OH, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated; JON RAHN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; GENZYME INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, Plaintiffs, v. GENZYME CORPORATION; HENRI A. TERMEER; DAVID P. MEEKER; MICHAEL S. WYZGA; ALLISON LAWTON; MARK R. BAMFORTH; GEOFFREY MCDONOUGH, Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 5, 2014, is amended as follows: On page 20, line 20: replace "defendants's allegedly misleading" with "defendants' allegedly misleading" On page 23, line 10: replace "defendants earlier positive" with "defendants' earlier positive" On page 23, line 16: replace "plaintiffs' would have preferred" with "plaintiffs would have preferred" On page 25, line 16: replace "Geel and Allston facility" with "Geel and Allston facilities" On page 29, line 13: replace "Plaintiffs' also assert" with "Plaintiffs also assert" On page 33, line 15: replace "post judgment" with "post- judgment" On page 36, line 18: replace "abuse it's discretion" with "abuse its discretion"

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.