Hudspeth v. Dvork

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit September 22, 1938

Hudspeth v. Dvork, 99 F.2d 69 (10th Cir. 1938)

1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806

Opinion of the Court

T^TTTT T TT^r, .. T j PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

These cases present the identical question decided in Aderhold, Warden, v. Ash-lock, 10 Cir., 99 F.2d 67, decided September 22, 1938, and on authority thereof, the several judgments appealed from are reversed and the causes remanded with instructions to vacate the several judgments directing the discharge of the appellees, to enter orders that appellees be redelivei ed to the custody of the Warden, and to issue and execute such writs or processes as may be necessary to make such orders effective.

Reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name: Robert H. HUDSPETH, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas v. Paul DVORK, Appellee Robert H. HUDSPETH, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas v. Walter Vance PISTOLE, Appellee A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary Annex, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas v. Lee BORAH, Appellee A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary Annex, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas v. Roy D. MANN, Appellee Robert H. HUDSPETH, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas v. Elmer SUTTON, Appellee Robert H. HUDSPETH, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas v. James J. WALSH
Status: Published