U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1956

G. R. Crusen, L. F. Gunderson, and L. G. Van Lehn v. United Air Lines, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided December 24, 1956 · Phillips, Murrah, Lewis

239 F.2d 863; 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2282; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4240 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Stephen C. Vladeck, New York City (B. F. Napheys, Jr., Denver, Colo., was on the brief), for appellants., Edmund A. Stephan, Chicago, 111. (John P. Akolt, John P. Akolt, Jr., Denver, Colo., Charles F. McErlean and Stuart Bernstein, Chicago, 111., were with him on the brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Sheehan v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (4th Cir. 1978)
Sheehan v. Union Pacific Railroad (10th Cir. 1978)
Sheehan v. Union Pacific Railroad (District Court, D. Utah 1976)
Transport Workers Union Of America v. American Airlines (10th Cir. 1969)
Transport Workers Union of America v. American Airlines, Inc. (10th Cir. 1969)
International Ass'n of Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)
Harold E. Arnold v. United Air Lines, Inc. (7th Cir. 1961)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court of Colorado challenging the dismissal of appellants’ complaint seeking a declaration of pilots’ seniority rights under a collective bargaining agreement.

The dismissal is based upon a finding that the appellants had not exhausted their administrative remedies by failing to file a timely appeal with the United Air Line Pilots System Board of Adjustment, established under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 184.

The facts are well stated in the memorandum opinion and order of the trial court. See D.C., 141 F.Supp. 347. We agree with the trial court’s opinion and its judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated therein.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.