U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1965

Emeary Moreland, Jr. v. United States

Emeary Moreland, Jr. v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided June 22, 1965 · Pickett, Lewis, Seth
347 F.2d 376; 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5168 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Emeary Moreland, Jr., pro se., Richard T. Spriggs, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo. (Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., with him on the brief), for appellee.

Emeary Moreland, Jr. v. United States

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision. The 11 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*377 PER CURIAM.

The appellant Moreland was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado of the crime of armed robbery, in violation of 18 U. S.C. § 2114. His conviction was affirmed. Moreland v. United States, 10 Cir., 270 F.2d 887. This proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 attacks the judgment and sentence on the ground that Moreland’s arrest by state officers without a warrant was in violation of his constitutional rights. We find no error in the trial court’s dismissal of the petition without a hearing.

An illegal arrest without more does not void a conviction and is not grounds for collateral attack under Section 2255. Tanner v. United States, 10 Cir., 296 F.2d 218; Roddy v. United States, 10 Cir. 296 F.2d 9; Klink v. Looney, 10 Cir., 262 F.2d 119; Whitney V. Zerbst, 10 Cir., 62 F.2d 970.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.