ORDER.

Thogmartin was notified that this court was considering summary affirmance, and he took the opportunity afforded him to file a memorandum opposing such disposition. Nonetheless, examination of the file and records in this cause prompts the conclusion that the questions presented are so unsubstantial as not to require further argument. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the court’s own motion, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order of the district court, 313 F.Supp. 158 (D.Kan. 1969).