U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1970

Larry Charles Clonce v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided October 5, 1970 · Lewis, Pickett, Kerr

432 F.2d 442 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Nathan G. Graham, U. S. Atty., for appellee., Larry Charles Clonce, pro se.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Leahy v. Estelle (District Court, N.D. Texas 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clonce was informed that the court was contemplating summary affirmance of the district court judgment because of the unsubstantial issue presented for our decision. He opposed the assignment without addressing the underlying merits and we granted him an additional period of time to submit further papers which he has now done.

We have thoroughly considered the files and record in this cause and are convinced that the judgment of the district court was correct.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court order of February 25, 1970, 317 F.Supp. 650, denying relief.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.