U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1970

National Labor Relations Board v. Tonkawa Refining Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided December 22, 1970 · Lewis, Phillips, Johnsen

434 F.2d 1041; 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5863 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Lynn D. Poole, Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Leonard M. Wagman, Washington, D. C., on the brief) for petitioner., John Cosmic, Amarillo, Tex., for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

National Labor Relations Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated (10th Cir. 1977)
National Labor Relations Board v. Tonkawa Refining Company (10th Cir. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its remedial order premised on a finding that respondent violated section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by announcing and granting wage increases in order to induce employees to reject the designation of a union as a bargaining agent in a pending representation election. The Board Decision and Order is found at 175 NLRB No. 102. From our review of the record we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board finding and hold that its remedial order is not abusively broad.

Enforcement will be granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.