United States Steel Corporation v. Gobel Mattingly, Eugene E. Morris, Etc. v. Gobel Mattingly, Bruce W. Christ
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Aero Tech, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation (District Court, D. New Mexico 2023)
- Ceroni v. 4FRONT ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS, INC. (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 2011)
- Tholen Supply Co., Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co. (District Court, D. Kansas 1994)
- Smith v. CRC Builders Co., Inc. (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 1983)
- Reeder v. United States (District Court, D. New Mexico 2024)
- America West Bank Members v. State of Utah, The (District Court, D. Utah 2021)
- Armstrong v. Arcanum Group, Inc. (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 2017)
- Robbins v. Wilkie (District Court, D. Wyoming 2003)
- State of Kansas v. Mark Call, Glenda Waggoner, and Mike Burch, Otto Privette Robert Benton, Movants-Appellees (10th Cir. 1992)
- Hotel Employees-Hotel Ass'n Pension Fund v. Timperio (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1985)
- Northrop Corporation v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation (D.C. Cir. 1984)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the motion of appellee, United States Steel Corporation, to vacate the order of this Court granting the government’s motion for temporary stay of the order of the United States District Court compelling enforcement of a subpoena directed by United States Steel Corporation against appellant, Bruce W. Christ, an employee of the Bureau of Standards.
Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, and the oral arguments, we have concluded that the motion of United States Steel Corporation for vacation of our temporary stay must be denied and that the merits of this dispute are controlled by United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462, 71 S.Ct. 416, 95 L.Ed. 417 (1951) and Saunders v. The Great Western Sugar Company, 396 F.2d 794 (10th Cir. 1968). Thus, we hold that the District Court erred in enforcing the subpoena.
The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to recall the subpoena and dismiss all proceedings with regard thereto.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.