U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1989

Eric E. Chandler and Peggy K. Chandler v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided October 31, 1989 · Moore, Seth, Brorby

887 F.2d 1397; 64 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5855; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16299; 1989 WL 128513 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William S. Rose, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., James I.K. Knapp, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Gary R. Allen, Jonathan S. Cohen and Nancy G. Morgan, Attys., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Brent D. Ward, U.S. Atty., Salt Lake City, Utah, of counsel, for defendant-appellant., Eric E. Chandler and Peggy K. Chandler, Centerville, Utah, pro se.

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision. The 10 that cite it most often are listed here.

Mann v. United States (10th Cir. 2000)
Elvis E. Johnson v. Robert Sawyer, United States of America (5th Cir. 1993)
Elvis E. Johnson v. Robert Sawyer, United States of America (5th Cir. 1992)
Rice v. United States (10th Cir. 1999)
Johnson v. Sawyer,et al (5th Cir. 1997)
Rowley v. United States (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1994)
Johnson v. Sawyer (5th Cir. 1993)
Mallas v. United States (4th Cir. 1993)
Johnson v. Sawyer (5th Cir. 1992)
Weiner v. Internal Revenue Service-Collections Division (District Court, S.D. New York 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

The United States appeals from an order of the district court awarding damages of $1,000 to plaintiffs for negligent and unauthorized disclosure of their tax return information. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103, 7431 (1982 & Supp. V 1987). After examining the briefs, record on appeal, and relevant case law, we AFFIRM the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Hyatt, 697 F.2d 899 (10th Cir. 1983); Chandler v. United States, 687 F.Supp. 1515 (D.Utah 1988).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.