Ralph Carlton Fisher v. Stephen W. Kaiser, Robert H. Henry, Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Ralph Carlton Fisher v. Stephen W. Kaiser, Robert H. Henry, Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma, 936 F.2d 582 (10th Cir. 1991)
1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19261; 1991 WL 104298

Ralph Carlton Fisher v. Stephen W. Kaiser, Robert H. Henry, Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma

Opinion

936 F.2d 582

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Tenth Circuit Rule 36.3 states that unpublished opinions and orders and judgments have no precedential value and shall not be cited except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ralph Carlton FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Stephen W. KAISER, Robert H. Henry, Attorney General for the
State of Oklahoma, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6409.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 11, 1991.

Before McKAY, SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

We grant the certificate of probable cause and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court order of dismissal.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Reference

Status
Unpublished