Russell v. Turnbaugh

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Russell v. Turnbaugh, 957 F.2d 796 (10th Cir. 1992)
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2683

Russell v. Turnbaugh

Opinion

957 F.2d 796

William Carroll RUSSELL, Jr., an individual, doing business
as Weekly Register-Call, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kay TURNBAUGH and Ruth Ann Andere, individuals; KLT
Communications, Inc., a Colorado corporation, also
known as KLT Communications, Inc.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1121.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 25, 1992.

(D.C. No. 90-F-272) (D. Colorado), Sherman G. Finesilver--J.

Before SEYMOUR, MOORE and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed.R.App.P., and the stipulation submitted by the parties, this appeal is dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its judgment and dismiss the complaint. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40 (1950); Beattie v. United States, 949 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir. 1991); Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 826 F.2d 948 (10th Cir. 1987).

2

Each party shall bear its own costs and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

Reference

Full Case Name
William Carroll Russell, Jr., an Individual, Doing Business as Weekly Register-Call v. Kay Turnbaugh and Ruth Ann Andere, Individuals Klt Communications, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Also Known as Klt Communications, Inc.
Status
Published