U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1994

United States v. Carno Ian Payne

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided April 13, 1994 · Moore, McWilliams, Kelly

21 F.3d 1023; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7224; 1994 WL 123656 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Larry Gomez, U.S. Atty., and Presiliano A. Torrez, Asst. U.S. Atty., Albuquerque, NM; and Kathleen A. Felton, Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, on the briefs for plaintiff-appellant., Alan F. Zvolanek, Albuquerque, NM, on the briefs for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Millennium Auto Sales LLC v. Pacific Specialty Insurance Company (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2022)
(PC) Carter v. California Correctional Institution (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

We conclude this appeal is governed by United States v. Little, 18 F.3d 1499, 1504-05 (10th Cir. 1994) (en banc). The judgment of the district court 1 is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

. See United States v. Miller, 811 F.Supp. 1485 (D.N.M. 1993).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.