U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1994

United States v. Miller

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided April 13, 1994 · Kelly, McWilliams, Moore

21 F.3d 1025; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7226; 1994 WL 123669 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Larry Gomez, U.S. Atty., and Thomas L. English, Asst. U.S. Atty., Albuquerque, NM, on the brief for plaintiff-appellant., Stephen P. McCue, Supervisory Asst., Federal Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, on the brief for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

L.S. v. Happy Hippo, LLC (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2025)
AirWair International Ltd. v. Pull & Bear Espana SA (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

We have concluded this appeal is governed by United States v. Little, 18 F.3d 1499, 1504-05 (10th Cir. 1994) (en banc). The judgment of the district court1 is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings.

. See United States v. Miller, 811 F.Supp. 1485 (D.N.M. 1993).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.