U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1994

Gallagher v. Hannigan

Gallagher v. Hannigan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided April 15, 1994 · Anderson, Kelly, Moore
24 F.3d 68; 1994 WL 178574 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Gallagher v. Hannigan

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Michael P. Gallagher has filed a motion to proceed without payment of fees and an application for a certificate of probable cause. The district court dismissed the petition because petitioner had failed to first raise in the state courts the issues asserted in the federal habeas action. There is no question that conclusion is correct.

Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of an important federal right by demonstrating that the issues raised are debatable among jurists, that a court could resolve the issues differently, or that the questions deserve further proceedings. Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 103 S.Ct. 3883, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983). The certificate of probable cause is therefore DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.