Boyer v. Johnson County Board
Boyer v. Johnson County Board
Opinion
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 31 1997 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk
KATHLEEN J. BOYER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. No. 96-3123 (D.C. No. 94-4078-SAC) JOHNSON COUNTY BOARD OF (D. Kan.) COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
Defendant-Appellee.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRORBY and KELLY, Circuit Judges, and CAUTHRON, ** District Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore
ordered submitted without oral argument.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. ** Honorable Robin J. Cauthron, District Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, sitting by designation. In this action alleging an unlawful constructive discharge from public
employment, plaintiff appeals the district court’s decision dismissing her state law
claim, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and granting defendant summary judgment on
her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Reviewing the district
court’s decisions de novo, see McCarter v. West, 105 F.3d 1335, 1336 (10th Cir.
1997) (summary judgment); Yoder v. Honeywell Inc., 104 F.3d 1215, 1224 (10th
Cir. 1997) (Rule 12 (b)(6)), we AFFIRM for substantially the reasons stated in the
district court’s memorandum and order dated March 5, 1996, Boyer v. Board of
County Comm’rs, 922 F. Supp. 476 (D. Kan. 1996).
Entered for the Court
Wade Brorby Circuit Judge
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished