Thompson v. Limke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Thompson v. Limke

Opinion

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk

CLINTON K. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 96-6231 v. (D.C. No. 95-CV-1718) (Western District of Oklahoma) TED LIMKE; EDWIN KIMMEL,

Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

After consideration of the briefs and the record, we conclude the district court did

not err in its judgment. We therefore AFFIRM substantially for the reasons given by the

district court.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge

-2-

Reference

Status
Published