Thompson v. Limke
Thompson v. Limke
Opinion
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk CLINTON K. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 96-6231 v. (D.C. No. 95-CV-1718) (Western District of Oklahoma) TED LIMKE; EDWIN KIMMEL, Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
After consideration of the briefs and the record, we conclude the district court did not err in its judgment. We therefore AFFIRM substantially for the reasons given by the district court.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.