U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1998

Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.

Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Decided May 5, 1998
158 F.3d 1060; 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1093; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 34140 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.

Opinion

158 F.3d 1060

8 A.D. Cases 1093

Robert W. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MIDLAND BRAKE, INC., a division of Echlin, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Equal Employment Advisory Council; Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission; City and County of
Denver, Amici Curiae.

No. 96-3018.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

May 5, 1998.

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY, EBEL, KELLY, HENRY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The court grants rehearing en banc in this case on the issue of interpretation of the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., specifically 42 U.S .C. § 12111(9)(B).

2

Appellant shall file a supplemental brief on or before June 4, 1998. Appellee shall file a response brief within 25 days of service of appellant's brief.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.