Perrin v. City of Denver
Opinion
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
APR 8 1999
TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk HEULON L. PERRIN, JR., also known as Heulon Perrin, Jr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 98-1389 v. D. Colorado
CITIES OF DENVER, BOULDER, (D.C. No. 98-D-1627) AND LAKEWOOD, COLORADO,
Defendants - Appellees, DENVER MAYOR WEBB, AND BOULDER MAYOR BOB GREENEE,
Defendants.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before ANDERSON , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34 (a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The district court dismissed Heulon L. Perrin, Jr.’s civil rights suit, without prejudice to his ability to refile if he complied with the rules of the court, including filing sanctions imposed on Mr. Perrin by the district court on September 10, 1991. The court did not err in dismissing this case without prejudice.
Mr. Perrin’s motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs or fees is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED on the grounds that it is frivolous.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.